Challenges by Category
Technology Status
NGO Interventions
Top Challenges by Occurrences
Top Challenges
| # | Challenge | Occurrences |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cultural belief and norms | 1 |
| 2 | Lack of exemplary leadership | 1 |
| 3 | Unsuitable technologies-ecosan | 1 |
| 4 | Lack of handwashing facilities | 1 |
All Challenges in Amudat
| Challenge | Category | Locations | About |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultural belief and norms | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Lack of exemplary leadership | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Lack of handwashing facilities | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Unsuitable technologies-ecosan | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
Technology Distribution
Technologies by Status
| Status | Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Functioning | 0 | 0% |
| Not Functioning | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
All Technologies in Amudat
| Technology | Category | Sub Category | Location | Capital Cost | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved Sanitation | Sanitation | - | 400K | Review | |
| Traditional VIPit latrines | Sanitation | - | 3.5M | Review | |
| Lined VIPs | Sanitation | - | 4M | Review | |
| Flush toilets/Pour flush | Sanitation | - | 5M | Review | |
| Hygiene | Sanitation | - | 20K-1M depending on type | Review | |
| Facial Cleanliness | Sanitation | - | 1000K per week | Review | |
| Faecal Sludge Mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Waste water | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Storm water mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Improved Sanitation | Sanitation | - | 400K | Review | |
| Traditional VIPit latrines | Sanitation | - | 3.5M | Review | |
| Lined VIPs | Sanitation | - | 4M | Review | |
| Flush toilets/Pour flush | Sanitation | - | 5M | Review | |
| Hygiene | Sanitation | - | 20K-1M depending on type | Review | |
| Facial Cleanliness | Sanitation | - | 1000K per week | Review | |
| Faecal Sludge Mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Waste water | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Storm water mgt | Sanitation | - | Review |
NGO Distribution
NGOs Operating
| # | NGO Name | Technology |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caritas - Moroto Diocese | DBH Rehab |
| 2 | Caritas Moroto | traditional pit latrines |
| 3 | Coorperation and Development | DBH Rehab |
| 4 | Food for the Hungry - Uganda | DBH Drilling |
| 5 | RTI research triangle international | Facial Cleaning |
| 6 | Save the children | traditional pit latrines |
| 7 | Save the Children -Uganda | DBH Rehab |
| 8 | Yes | Enviromental pollution from smoke due to burning; and possible pollution of soils from buried ash |
| 9 | Yes | Open to flies that spread desease causing pathogens |
| 10 | Yes | Air pollution |
| 11 | Yes | Possible ground water pollution by decomposing matter |
| 12 | Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention |
| 13 | Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. |
| 14 | Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. |
| 15 | Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention |
NGO Details
| NGO Name | Technology | Areas of Operation | Steps Followed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caritas - Moroto Diocese | DBH Rehab | Looro, Amudat s/c... | MoU, engagement meetings, assessment of water sources, rehabilitation, hand over... |
| Caritas Moroto | traditional pit latrines | Loro and Amudat... | - |
| Coorperation and Development | DBH Rehab | - | MoU,... |
| Food for the Hungry - Uganda | DBH Drilling | Karita, Lokales, Losidok s/c... | MoU, Identification of villages, procurement, drilling, hand over... |
| RTI research triangle international | Facial Cleaning | 32 selected villages across the district... | - |
| Save the children | traditional pit latrines | all sub-counties... | MoU... |
| Save the Children -Uganda | DBH Rehab | all sub-counties in specific villages where the Apolou project is.... | Mou, Baseline survey, mapping of boreholes, engagement meetings with communities... |
| Yes | Enviromental pollution from smoke due to burning; and possible pollution of soils from buried ash | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Open to flies that spread desease causing pathogens | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Air pollution | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Possible ground water pollution by decomposing matter | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention | Yes... | - |
| Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. | Yes... | - |
| Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. | Yes... | - |
| Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention | Yes... | - |
Challenges
| Challenge | Category | Locations | About |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultural belief and norms | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Lack of exemplary leadership | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Lack of handwashing facilities | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
| Unsuitable technologies-ecosan | Sanitation | No location specified | - |
Technologies
| Technology | Category | Sub Category | Location | Capital Cost | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved Sanitation | Sanitation | - | 400K | Review | |
| Traditional VIPit latrines | Sanitation | - | 3.5M | Review | |
| Lined VIPs | Sanitation | - | 4M | Review | |
| Flush toilets/Pour flush | Sanitation | - | 5M | Review | |
| Hygiene | Sanitation | - | 20K-1M depending on type | Review | |
| Facial Cleanliness | Sanitation | - | 1000K per week | Review | |
| Faecal Sludge Mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Waste water | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Storm water mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Improved Sanitation | Sanitation | - | 400K | Review | |
| Traditional VIPit latrines | Sanitation | - | 3.5M | Review | |
| Lined VIPs | Sanitation | - | 4M | Review | |
| Flush toilets/Pour flush | Sanitation | - | 5M | Review | |
| Hygiene | Sanitation | - | 20K-1M depending on type | Review | |
| Facial Cleanliness | Sanitation | - | 1000K per week | Review | |
| Faecal Sludge Mgt | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Waste water | Sanitation | - | Review | ||
| Storm water mgt | Sanitation | - | Review |
NGOs
| NGO Name | Technology | Areas of Operation | Steps Followed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caritas - Moroto Diocese | DBH Rehab | Looro, Amudat s/c... | MoU, engagement meetings, assessment of water sources, rehabilitation, hand over... |
| Caritas Moroto | traditional pit latrines | Loro and Amudat... | - |
| Coorperation and Development | DBH Rehab | - | MoU,... |
| Food for the Hungry - Uganda | DBH Drilling | Karita, Lokales, Losidok s/c... | MoU, Identification of villages, procurement, drilling, hand over... |
| RTI research triangle international | Facial Cleaning | 32 selected villages across the district... | - |
| Save the children | traditional pit latrines | all sub-counties... | MoU... |
| Save the Children -Uganda | DBH Rehab | all sub-counties in specific villages where the Apolou project is.... | Mou, Baseline survey, mapping of boreholes, engagement meetings with communities... |
| Yes | Enviromental pollution from smoke due to burning; and possible pollution of soils from buried ash | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Open to flies that spread desease causing pathogens | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Air pollution | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Possible ground water pollution by decomposing matter | Yes... | MoU, inception meeting, construction of Technology, Training and demonstration... |
| Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention | Yes... | - |
| Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. | Yes... | - |
| Yes | no physical barriers to block enviromental degraders. | Yes... | - |
| Yes | Long growth time challenge that leads to delayed impact of the technology in intervations such as erosion prevention | Yes... | - |